In one word, Jaguar’s rebrand is brutal. It’s a classic case of a bold move backfiring—widely mocked and alienating a loyal customer base. While rebrands are meant to breathe new life into a brand, this one feels more like an identity crisis. They sure did make a lot of noise for everyone to start talking about it. But is it good for the brand? If yes, then how exactly? Maybe only time will tell whether the dust will settle on this one. Learning from the past, Airbnb's controversial 2014 refresh, have proven to have impressive staying power.
A few things that left me questioning about this rebrand:
The new tagline: “Delete Ordinary.” While it sounds punchy, it doesn’t mean much. The claim that the brand is “returning to its original essence” feels a bit disconnected, especially when the execution abandons everything that once made Jaguar iconic. Instead of capturing the brand’s storied legacy and emotional connection with its audience, the new look and launch film feel more akin to a fashion brand than a luxury car manufacturer.
If “delete ordinary” was meant to honor the car’s essence and its buyers’ emotions, the rebrand missed the mark. Jaguar’s past campaigns were masterclasses in sharp alignment - messaging, visuals, and tone worked seamlessly with the brand’s DNA.
Here’s a thought: Legacy isn’t a burden - it could be an asset if used right.
Jaguar already had a pretty solid and a timeless logo with the sans serif typeface. Sure, EV brands are expected to look modern, sleek, and futuristic, but there are ways to achieve that without stripping an identity down to something unrecognizable.
Good design marries the future with the past, building a bridge between heritage and innovation. What Jaguar delivered is more of a generic aesthetic - could easily be mistook for a tech startup or lifestyle brand than a luxury automobile company with decades of history.
At its core, Jaguar is a luxury car brand, EV or not. But the rebrand somehow did not prioritize the car. Instead, it leans heavily into performative diversity: gender-fluid models in androgynous clothing, pink-hued hellscapes as backdrops, and a complete departure from the visceral emotion of driving a Jaguar.
This raises the question: Who exactly is this for?
Jaguar’s audience - the loyalists who admired the brand for its sleek sophistication - could hardly relate to the new imagery. Luxury cars are about aspiration, power, and emotional resonance. Was the objective to just get people talking?
It’s clear Jaguar wanted to reposition itself, shedding the weight of past losses. That’s understandable.
This is exactly where there was an opportunity to carve out a bold new statement in the EV landscape while honoring Jaguar’s rich history. Smart rebranding retains the essence of the past while signaling a brighter future without abandoning the identity in the process.
(Not a big fan of could-have-beens and should-have-beens, but well.. here we are.)
This rebrand could have been a moment of reckoning - a chance for Jaguar to stand tall as a leader in the EV market, blending its storied legacy with cutting-edge technology. Instead, we’re left with an identity that feels uncharacteristic, incomplete, and devoid of depth.
The EV space is already becoming dangerously homogenous. Too many brands are chasing the same minimalistic, hyper-modern aesthetic, leaving individuality in the dust. Jaguar had a golden opportunity to stand out by leveraging its unique history and charm - but instead, it blurred itself into the crowd.
Rebranding is risky. When done right, it breathes new life into a brand while honoring its roots. But Jaguar’s attempt feels more like a leap into the void.
Because, let’s face it, nobody wants to drive a car—or align with a brand—that looks like every other one out there especially in the luxury segment.
When I started working in the creative business, you didn’t have to look hard to find legends.
In an era where design is increasingly shaped by algorithmic trends, international platforms, and rapidly shifting consumer tastes, minimalism has emerged as a dominant visual code—marketed as a global aesthetic standard. Its language of clean lines, neutral palettes, and sparse environments is often equated with clarity, modernism, progress, and good taste.
In tech and creative spaces, we often hear failure talked about like it’s a badge of honor—something you collect on the road to success.
344 Corning AVE, Milipitas
California 95035
Baron House, 29, 80 Feet Rd,
S.T. Bed, 4th Block, Koramangala,
Bengaluru, Karnataka 560034
